Obama, raised fatherless, denigrates men, harms children, and promotes single motherhood with executive order signed yesterday.
On March 11, 2009, in Washington, President Obama signed an Executive Order creating the White House Council on Women and Girls; and by fiat, seeks to devalue fathers and men, and promote single parenthood as something young girls should achieve, and reinforces the creation of a whole new class of special victims “both at home and abroad” (whatever that means). Read release from the White House posted on their website.
Men and women in the role of parents, are two sides of the same coin and have to be seen as a single unit or ‘being’.
President Obama signs an Executive Order creating the White House Council on Women and Girls.
When speaking of men and women in terms of the family, or with respect to children, they are both two sides of the same coin. You can’t separate them, if you praise one, by inference you automatically disparage the other. The concept of parents as a team, indivisible, united, tied together in a symbiotic relationship, physically and emotionally, is being destroyed in this country by changing the notion of single parenthood from something to be avoided at all costs, as broken, defective, abnormal, shunned and shameful to be something to be promoted as good, heroic, supported, praised and worse of all, something that is ‘normal’.
It’s as if someone ran around proclaiming his right foot was something special and needed special treatment and protection above all other feet. What does this say about the left foot? About the person? Do you see the absurdity in this idea?
Exalting women, especially for something that normally should be a negative, devalues men, fathers and hurts children.
Obama, raised fatherless himself, is a “defective product” of our single parent, fatherless society he so often praises. Children raised fatherless often have a distorted view of women, their proper role in their relationships with men and their abilities and issues. They also have a distorted view of fathers and men. The distortion always tends to be sympathetic and positive towards women and single mothers, and negative and disparaging towards men. It is as if the mother’s anger towards men, their constant blaming for their dismal situation, lack of money or resources on the father, is transferred to the child.
This transference is done slowly, insidiously, subconsciously and not just from the mother, the emotionally developing child picks this blame game up from other sources in society such as television, Hollywood and politicians. Even if the message is very subtle, (and it normally is) the child gets it from inference and deduction.
What else would we expect? The single parent child is constantly hearing how difficult it is for his mother and how she “struggles”, how much she sacrifices for her children, how heroic she is.
First Lady Michelle Obama joins in the applause at the Executive Order signing ceremony Wednesday, March 11, 2009 in the East Room of the White House, creating the White House Council on Women and Girls. White House Photo/Pete Souza
If we have such a wonderful heroine, logically we must have an equally evil villain. Logically therefore, since the father is the other half of the coin, and all the other kids have fathers, and the father is not around to defend himself, the child sees the father as the villain.
Making “violence against women” a special class of crime creates a special class of victims, and therefore, logically, a special class of criminals and villains, all to be treated differently, worse then ‘regular’ criminals. Is not violence simply violence? Why can’t we just be against violence? If we somehow raise violence against women to a special place as being especially evil, are we saying that other forms of violence is somehow less evil? Are we now saying the men who commit violence against women are now especially evil? Worse than ordinary criminals?
If there is no ‘bad’, then, there is no ‘good’.
Obama and the liberals are invested in coming up with new ‘bad’. The liberals have always loved to constantly create new and more classes of victims. Why? Because if you don’t have victims, you don’t have a cause, a movement, a crusade, a fight. We all know that in a fight there are two sides, evil vs. good. Therefore, since the so-called ‘victim’ could only become a victim by an act of victimization by someone, and that someone logically must be an evil villain, the liberals now have a cause to join and, of course, they will join the fight on the side of “good” so they feel good about themselves!
Why would they need to feel especially good about themselves in the first place?
This is because that they know, perhaps subconsciously or instinctively, that what they are doing, is inherently wrong to begin with. Mothers, somehow sense that depriving a child of their father is wrong and being a single parent is not normal and is difficult on them both. So to compensate, they seek to make themselves feel better, they seek out praise and re-enforcement that they are doing the right thing and, therefore, based on the fact that they are good, the father obviously is to blame.
Good and bad are basic, instinctive emotional feelings and concepts. So is blame.
Don’t they realize what they are doing? No. If you want a quick fix and you operate on emotion as mothers are designed to do, you cannot evaluate your situation based upon logic or common sense. It simply is easier to explain to the fatherless child who yearns for his long ago rejected father, that “daddy is bad”. The liberals have seized on this as a way to get votes from females. Why else would Obama so often praise single mothers, denigrate and insult men and fathers in his “Father’s day Speech” in a church no less.
To sum it up Obama, a defective child himself is repeating the cycle of his fatherless upbringing. He has helped to create a whole bunch of women good-doers that want to feel good about themselves as they go about destroying families, their children and themselves.
They are taking a big sharp knife and stabbing it as hard as they can, in their left foot; simply because they hear it is good to spite their right foot.
Barrack Obama: “blown and tossed by the wind” of fatherlessness
Our country is so messed up that I increasingly worry a lot about its near future. If it was not for my faith in the Living God – the God of Abraham Lincoln, 1863 – I would be living daily with anxiety, depressions and all sorts of destructive addictions. But, by faith, my first hope is to live to see the punishments of the wicked and a better tomorrow for my children and my grand- as well as my great-grand-children. I originally favored Barack Obama as a U.S. President because I did not know all the truth about him: I failed to seek behind the “good sentence/s” he spoke during the US elections frenzies. But now, every day his words and decisions convince me that his administration could be worse than the previous one – or may be the worst U.S. President ever.
First of all, he seems to be a man without any convictions of his own and no “balls”.
Second of all, if he had any convictions, now he is compromising on every issue – which is typical of boys who grew up without a father.
Third of all, may be he is (only temporary, I hope) “intoxicated by (his) unbroken success” – Abraham Lincoln may agree.
Barack Obama may be like “a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind” – typical of a person without strong convictions. What “WIND” you may ask? From what I see, it’s the deceptive wind of fatherlessness in the US: the dark forces of evil that are determined to destroy U.S. families by:
1. Removing the fathers from the homes,
2. And annihilating the children (the future generation).
I am afraid that if Barrack Obama does not re-evaluate and assess his weaknesses sooner rather than later and take immediate corrective actions, he will soon realize that his White House is not “built upon a rock” – unless his chosen “rock” is his wife Michelle or/and “that another rock: Bishop Arthur Brazier”). In good faith, the bishop should remind you that Peter is the only rock there ever is [Matthew 16:18], as clearly stated by Jesus-Christ Himself. But, political cowardice dictates that it is politically incorrect to name Jesus-Christ in politics or in public. So, “a good compromise” is found in the Bishop and later in Michelle. If Michelle is “his rock” what role is left for Barrack in the family? If Obama is not the “rock” for his own family – or for his daughters for that matter – what kind of hope can a country find in that man. If his rock is not strong enough, the gates of Hades will soon overcome the house that is built on that rock. In other words, as “the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that ‘White’ House” he will know who “The Rock” is – in terrible ways for himself and for the United States nation.
Schools and universities teach boys academic knowledge. The Bible teaches the Truth. But, a Father teaches his sons and daughters something called FORTITUDE. If you do not know this word by now, that is because you did not grow up in a home with a Father or you refused to submit to his authority. But, if you still have one, you should ask him. I do not mean to offend the reader, but when you read the Merriam-Webster’s definition, you may quickly recognize a character in your dad. It defines “fortitude” as “strength of mind that enables a person to encounter danger or bear pain or adversity with courage and strength”. Maybe Barrack has none of that himself that’s why he said that Michelle is “my rock”. The fact and the matter is Barrack never known his father or a significant male role model so, he always has to rely on a woman for survival or to hide his fears or timidity. Fortitude is what makes a man TO STAND in the rain, through the floods and the winds. A single mother will never replace a Father. Neither a grandmother ever will. Neither the U.S. government nor “The White House Council on Women and Girls” – for that matter – can give a boy this important asset called FORTITUDE. When the fathers are removed from the children’s lives by the U.S. government with the complicity of #1) the mothers (greed), #2) the Family Court judges (wickedness) and now by #3) the influence of The White House Council on Women and Girls, all that is left for the boys to learn is to make “a good comprise/lie” and preparing them to become political cowards (http://www.politicalcowardice.com/) for the US government.
Show me an absentee-father and I will show you a greedy single mother with a US Court decree that denies the father and child access to each other. That’s too bad our fatherless-president does not get it – and still. Or isn’t it obvious. That is the vicious circle that is crippling the United States society since President Obama was born in 1961. Today, it produces a fatherless-nation and gives way to a fatherless-president who loves to make “a good compromise (cowardice)”, and to tell “a good sentence (a.k.a. a good lie)” that “makes sense” only to coward politicians who risk to choke the Administration and the country with “good piece/s of legislation/s” that further produces more unbalanced and unhealthy fatherless-children who will replace this generation of greedy corporations, voracious corporate officers and political cowards. I am afraid that is the only US factory that has not been shipped to abroad.
“A problem well stated is a problem half solved.” – Charles F. Kettering, US electrical engineer & inventor (1876 – 1958). I hope I’ve helped. That’s my second and audacious hope.
Thank-You