Political Cowardice

Christine, sorry but you got just about everything wrong.

First of all men are not monsters, corrupt and evil by nature. Men are designed to protect women and families. In order to be a good protector you have to be able to stand up for something and not cower and run.

If you do some research you will find that while many or if not most societies started out as matriarchal societies, they never lasted long because they were conquered and over-run by other societies because they had no male leaders to protect them. The males they had were so submissive and meek they were no match for the invaders.

Men become unusually violent because they are being suppressed, subdued and debased by society and the feminists. Furthermore, they find themselves in competition with women in the workplace and other areas where women were not normally or naturally found.

men, are by their nature corrupt and destructive. by their nature they are driven by testosterone there is little that can be done about this fact. Women on the other hand do not have this problem, we are driven by another universal ingredient that by its nature directs us to be caregivers at our most primal level, a lesser of the two evils, estrogeon. by — “Christine”

Women are designed to be nurturers, emotional and illogical. Men, on the other hand are made to be logical, fearless, aggressive and protective.

Yes Christine, men are useless, until the lights go out or you hear a noise downstairs at 2:00 am.

Read Christine’s absurd comments on a Story on U.S.News called: What Obama’s Council on Women Means for Your Health

Mike Truman Decline of the Family

The word ‘parenting’ is a meaningless word given to us from the PC police.

Whenever you hear this word ask the person if they mean fathering or mothering as there is no such thing as ‘parenting’. The word ‘parenting’ is used by the liberals and feminists to further destroy the family, debase men and fathers and blur the differences between men and women.

Thus we have the unisex, gelded ‘parent’.

Monica Lee and her ilk may think that taking the kids to the beach, buying ice cream and being “warm and fuzzy” and getting all touchy-feely and spending “quality time” are important traits of a good father and “proof” of “parenting skills”.

However, these traits and activities are more those of a mother than a father. Could this be because Obama was raised fatherless by his grandmother and is a ‘defective child’?

Read Lee’s piece of crap that passes as journalism on the phony website “examiner.com” where they apparently let any nit-wit become an “examiner”. “Obama proves he’s got parenting skills” by Monica Lee.

Perhaps what Monica Lee was really looking for was a babysitter for some of her five children while she attends college rather than taking care of her children herself. On a side note, another of her articles “Scholarship season” announces that college enrollment is high during the spring, perhaps due to the fact that that’s about when people are getting ready to graduate high school and move on to college. Shocking.

The problem is that we have not taught our children or even spoken of the real role of fathers for fear of the wrath of the feminists and the PC police. A father’s first responsibility is to provide for and protect his family. He is then responsible for leadership, making important decisions, providing discipline and organization for the family. Much of this is not done on the beaches of Hawaii. The father is the “rock” of the family, not “Michelle” as he claims.

This further proves that the liberals and feminists real agenda is to totally usurp the authority, responsibility and leadership of the father and place it in the hands of the “we got a program for that” government nanny-state.

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, Obama

On March 11, 2009, in Washington, President Obama signed an Executive Order creating the White House Council on Women and Girls; and by fiat, seeks to devalue fathers and men, and promote single parenthood as something young girls should achieve, and reinforces the creation of a whole new class of special victims “both at home and abroad” (whatever that means). Read release from the White House posted on their website.

Men and women in the role of parents, are two sides of the same coin and have to be seen as a single unit or ‘being’.

When speaking of men and women in terms of the family, or with respect to children, they are both two sides of the same coin. You can’t separate them, if you praise one, by inference you automatically disparage the other. The concept of parents as a team, indivisible, united, tied together in a symbiotic relationship, physically and emotionally, is being destroyed in this country by changing the notion of single parenthood from something to be avoided at all costs, as broken, defective, abnormal, shunned and shameful to be something to be promoted as good, heroic, supported, praised and worse of all, something that is ‘normal’.

It’s as if someone ran around proclaiming his right foot was something special and needed special treatment and protection above all other feet. What does this say about the left foot? About the person? Do you see the absurdity in this idea?

Exalting women, especially for something that normally should be a negative, devalues men, fathers and hurts children.

Obama, raised fatherless himself, is a “defective product” of our single parent, fatherless society he so often praises. Children raised fatherless often have a distorted view of women, their proper role in their relationships with men and their abilities and issues. They also have a distorted view of fathers and men. The distortion always tends to be sympathetic and positive towards women and single mothers, and negative and disparaging towards men. It is as if the mother’s anger towards men, their constant blaming for their dismal situation, lack of money or resources on the father, is transferred to the child.

This transference is done slowly, insidiously, subconsciously and not just from the mother, the emotionally developing child picks this blame game up from other sources in society such as television, Hollywood and politicians. Even if the message is very subtle, (and it normally is) the child gets it from inference and deduction.

What else would we expect? The single parent child is constantly hearing how difficult it is for his mother and how she “struggles”, how much she sacrifices for her children, how heroic she is.

If we have such a wonderful heroine, logically we must have an equally evil villain. Logically therefore, since the father is the other half of the coin, and all the other kids have fathers, and the father is not around to defend himself, the child sees the father as the villain.

Making “violence against women” a special class of crime creates a special class of victims, and therefore, logically, a special class of criminals and villains, all to be treated differently, worse then ‘regular’ criminals. Is not violence simply violence? Why can’t we just be against violence? If we somehow raise violence against women to a special place as being especially evil, are we saying that other forms of violence is somehow less evil? Are we now saying the men who commit violence against women are now especially evil? Worse than ordinary criminals?

If there is no ‘bad’, then, there is no ‘good’.

Obama and the liberals are invested in coming up with new ‘bad’. The liberals have always loved to constantly create new and more classes of victims. Why? Because if you don’t have victims, you don’t have a cause, a movement, a crusade, a fight. We all know that in a fight there are two sides, evil vs. good. Therefore, since the so-called ‘victim’ could only become a victim by an act of victimization by someone, and that someone logically must be an evil villain, the liberals now have a cause to join and, of course, they will join the fight on the side of “good” so they feel good about themselves!

Why would they need to feel especially good about themselves in the first place?

This is because that they know, perhaps subconsciously or instinctively, that what they are doing, is inherently wrong to begin with. Mothers, somehow sense that depriving a child of their father is wrong and being a single parent is not normal and is difficult on them both. So to compensate, they seek to make themselves feel better, they seek out praise and re-enforcement that they are doing the right thing and, therefore, based on the fact that they are good, the father obviously is to blame.

Good and bad are basic, instinctive emotional feelings and concepts. So is blame.

Don’t they realize what they are doing? No. If you want a quick fix and you operate on emotion as mothers are designed to do, you cannot evaluate your situation based upon logic or common sense. It simply is easier to explain to the fatherless child who yearns for his long ago rejected father, that “daddy is bad”. The liberals have seized on this as a way to get votes from females. Why else would Obama so often praise single mothers, denigrate and insult men and fathers in his “Father’s day Speech” in a church no less.

To sum it up Obama, a defective child himself is repeating the cycle of his fatherless upbringing. He has helped to create a whole bunch of women good-doers that want to feel good about themselves as they go about destroying families, their children and themselves.

They are taking a big sharp knife and stabbing it as hard as they can, in their left foot; simply because they hear it is good to spite their right foot.

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, Obama children, family, father's rights, fatherless

Great Communicator: Obama hides his double talk within his rhetoric

We all love to hear what we want to hear and it has never been easier than now with our silver tongued president.

When Obama says: “We have to look at offshore drilling”, the conservatives hear “Why of course we will have to open up these areas” and the liberal environmentalists hear “Why of course we will have to eliminate offshore drilling”.

In an era where we need to provide certainty and confidence to the markets, Obama and his real plans still remain an enigma to those listening to him talk.

On top of that investors are seeing a divide between what Obama says and what he does. Most obvious are the thousands of earmarks contained in the budget bill signed today. During the campaign Obama promised to eliminate earmarks if elected, however, his budget contains about 9,000 earmarks. Obama recently claimed that earmarks were taken care of when he was in the senate.

On top of all this, we still have a media that won’t allow anyone to challenge Obama, much less they themselves. The gullible press covering Obama are more like cheerleaders rather than hard-nosed reporters. I predict it will be said of the press that they let the country down at a time when they were needed the most.

Look at what happened to Limbaugh when he said he hoped Obama would fail and compare that to the reaction when James Carville said basically the same thing during a press conference in 2001 that he hoped George Bush would not succeed.

Barack Obama is a great pretender. He constantly says he’s doing things that he isn’t, and he relies on his powerful rhetoric to obscure the difference. He has made “responsibility” a personal theme, and the budget’s cover line is “A New Era of Responsibility.” He claims that the budget begins “making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline.” It doesn’t. –Presidential Double-Talk Robert J. Samuelson

Mike Truman National Political, Obama doublespeak, Obama

Lacking small business stimulus, the stimulus bill will fail

Small business is the backbone of the economy, responsible for more jobs overall than big business. Without helping small businesses no stimulus effort will succeed.

In addition to ignoring small businesses, which are the nation’s top job creators in the stimulus bill, President Obama has refused to stop rampant fraud and abuse in existing federal economic stimulus programs for small businesses. — PR Neswire

Read full article: Obama Economic Policy Falters Without Small Business Stimulus

Mike Truman National Political

Conservative MP’s furious

‘wholly inappropriate’

According to the Daily Mail: Lord Tebbit, the ex-Tory Cabinet minister whose wife was confined to a wheelchair after suffering terrible injuries when IRA terrorists bombed the party’s conference hotel in Brighton in 1984, said the honorary knighthood was ‘wholly inappropriate’.

Read Full Article: MPs’ fury as U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy gets honorary knighthood for Northern Ireland role

Kennedy, a suspected IRA sympathizer, is a radical left wing U.S. Senator who favors amnesty for illegal aliens and a whole host of far-left liberal socialist objectives.

Mike Truman National Political