Political Cowardice

By Mike Trueman

Family Violence Protection Fund offensive ads created under the direction of the Ad Council

I registered a complaint with Ellyn Fisher of the Ad Council (EFisher@AdCouncil.org) who is responsible for this offensive ad campaign for the Family Violence Protection Fund using pre-teen boys wearing “Awaiting Instructions” on their shirts.  Under the words “Respect Girls” the hidden message is girls are victims and boys represent abusers.

Let’s get ‘em while they are young and train them right.

To see the ads, see this post here:  http://www.politicalcowardice.com/2010/08/pre-teen-boys-denatured-by-radical-feminists-family-violence-prevention-fund-endabuse-org/

See press release for the campaign, if not this exact one a similar one.

Their website says it is no longer a campaign, however, the ads still appear on some websites.  Furthermore the press release contains misleading information concerning domestic violence.

Ms Fisher has not responded.

To voice your complaints, please contact Ellyn Fisher by email at: EFisher@AdCouncil.org or

Ellyn Fisher
The Ad Council
212-984-1964

Email: EFisher@AdCouncil.org

You can also complain to:
Doniece Sandoval
Family Violence Prevention Fund
415-252-8900, ext. 41
doniece@endabuse.org

.

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, National Political

The “men bad, women good” mantra fed to us by domestic violence prevention advocates, women’s shelter organizations and other well meaning “women’s rights” organizers, feminist groups, and politicians are just plain wrong.  They are relying on incorrect data.

- by Mike Trueman

The domestic violence claims, mostly by feminist groups, is turning out to be a fraud based upon faulty data, closed minds, blacklisting and retaliation very similar to the global warming hoax.

After seeing the disturbing ads in the post below from the Family Violence Prevention Fund, I have begun doing some research and have found some alarming data.

It turns out that women are more likely to 1) assault first; 2) use a weapon; 3)  to abuse children.

Women are as least as likely to be the perpetrator of violence as they are the victim.

According to FAMILY VIOLENCE A report from:  Family Resources & Research

“Abuse shelter advocates have severely distorted the picture and deliberately produce fraudulent statistics and dis-information. Even when they quote well-grounded statistics, they misuse the information. Here is an example: One of the favorite statistics quoted by abuse shelter advocates is that a woman is the victim of spousal violence every 15 seconds. This statistic is deduced from a well conducted piece of research which was published in the Journal of Marriage and Family, a respected professional journal for marriage and family therapists. The Abuse Shelter advocates arrived at this figure by using one of the conclusions of the study, i.e.; 1.8 million women suffer an assault from a husband or boyfriend per year. What abuse shelter advocates always fail to report is another finding of the same study, i.e.; 2 million men are assaulted by a wife or girl friend per year, which translates as, a man is the victim of spousal violence every 14 seconds.”

Read more…

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, National Political

Teen boys wearing sweats with “Awaiting Instructions” emblazoned on the front?  What is all this crap from something called the  Family Violence Prevention Fund about?

“Respect Girls”?  what do you think of this horrible ad de-balling innocent teen and pre-teen looking boys?  Why should young teens wear t-shirts or sweats with the words: “Awaiting Instructions” pasted across the front?

Since when are young boys abusing anyone?  Do these children look like abusers?  This gives new meaning to child abuse!

“Awaiting Instructions”?  From whom?  For What? Where did this come from?  What did this poor kid do to be branded an abuser and told to await instructions?

Looks like the folks at the  Family Violence Prevention Fund, (endabuse.org) want to turn our young boys into feminized Zombies, ball-less geldings, waiting to be awoken by a superior race and given some type of instructions.

The ad rotates with different pictures of young boys, with the bold text “RESPECT GIRLS”  and the boys, all about ten years old or less, wearing the words: “Awaiting Instructions” on their shirts or sweats.

“Respect Girls”?  What girls?   Why?  What did boys do to deserve this insult?  Why denigrate an entire  gender based upon some perceived  wrong?

Why do girls need to be respected more than boys?  Why not “respect boys”?   Why not “Respect each other”?  This is just another absurd example of feminism and political correctness gone berserk.

Myth: Women are abused more than men.  Fact: It is about 50/50, but men are less likely to report abuse.  See National Coalition for Men

Why cast young boys and male teens as some kind of villains and abusers?

Don’t listen to or give any of your money to these creeps!

This just re-enforces the feminist’s view and mantra that all men are abusers, all men are evil, all men are brutal.  The new twist?  Now they have added young pre-teen boys to their list of villains!

According to the folks at Family Violence Prevention Fund (endabuse.org) teen boys should be taking instructions from girls.  Why should girls not be taking instructions from boys?  Where is this written?

Why is it that the male is always assumed to be the abuser? No one is promoting abuse by anyone, but why demonize young boys who most likely are just thinking about baseball, not abuse.  This falsehood only unfairly and unduly stigmatizes boys and only makes the situation worse.

Look at some of the crap they at Family Violence Prevention Fund proclaim:

“Men by nature have this thing of always using force. When we were children, we would play with cars and figurines, such as superman and Spiderman, of physically strong men who used force to conquer the bad guys.”

Oh really?

Well, of course ALL boys do this, this is NATURAL. What do you expect boys to play with, dolls?  Well of course if you are the “Family Violence Protection Fund” you do!

Read more…

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, National Political

Here we go again…

As I explained before, people who grow up without strong male leadership, (a father) develop serious personality disorders, e.g. narcissism, etc. and are defective. Two of these many defects are present in Obama, lack of conviction and a need to please, we witness in Obama’s recent flip-flop on the 9/11 mosque debate.

See: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/15/us/politics/15mosque.html?src=me

First, vowing to stay out of the debate and repeatedly saying it was a “local decision” he gave in to his need to be loved by all at a recent white house dinner for Muslims, (that in it self is another story, I wonder why there are hardy any photos on www.whitehouse.gov?) came out in favor of building the controversial mosque citing freedom of religion and American values.

“This is America.  And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable.  The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are.  The writ of the Founders must endure.”
Now, less than 24 hours later, two of his defects kick in, one, his lack of conviction and two, his need to be loved by whoever is seeking it, he backtracks on his first change of his position to create a third position statement. Incredible.

Obama and those who are in favor of building a mosque at ground zero are wrong on many fronts; they often site “freedom of religion” and “American values” as their main reasons.

First of all Islam is more about a political movement and conquest than it is about a religion, and should not be considered on equal footing with other main-stream religions.

That can be a whole subject for another debate, however, even if you did conclude it is a valid religion there are additional issues.

One, a mosque is not equivalent to a church in the Western meaning. Second, “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state” have had their original meanings twisted so much as to make the present-day understandings incorrect.

The first amendment, below, does not explicitly grant the right to build a mosque any where you please and to have the government rush in and support you if you wanted to build a mosque say on an airport runway.

Since we have established that you can’t build a mosque, or anything else for that matter, ANY where you want, we still have the issue of how not building a mosque at ground zero, but some blocks away amounts to restricting the “free exercise thereof”.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Obama says the debate is about American values, good, because Islam is the antitheses of American values.   And most Americans know it.

Read more about the Mosque at 9/11

Mike Truman National Political, Obama

Christine, sorry but you got just about everything wrong.

First of all men are not monsters, corrupt and evil by nature. Men are designed to protect women and families. In order to be a good protector you have to be able to stand up for something and not cower and run.

If you do some research you will find that while many or if not most societies started out as matriarchal societies, they never lasted long because they were conquered and over-run by other societies because they had no male leaders to protect them. The males they had were so submissive and meek they were no match for the invaders.

Men become unusually violent because they are being suppressed, subdued and debased by society and the feminists. Furthermore, they find themselves in competition with women in the workplace and other areas where women were not normally or naturally found.

men, are by their nature corrupt and destructive. by their nature they are driven by testosterone there is little that can be done about this fact. Women on the other hand do not have this problem, we are driven by another universal ingredient that by its nature directs us to be caregivers at our most primal level, a lesser of the two evils, estrogeon. by — “Christine”

Women are designed to be nurturers, emotional and illogical. Men, on the other hand are made to be logical, fearless, aggressive and protective.

Yes Christine, men are useless, until the lights go out or you hear a noise downstairs at 2:00 am.

Read Christine’s absurd comments on a Story on U.S.News called: What Obama’s Council on Women Means for Your Health

Mike Truman Decline of the Family

The word ‘parenting’ is a meaningless word given to us from the PC police.

Whenever you hear this word ask the person if they mean fathering or mothering as there is no such thing as ‘parenting’. The word ‘parenting’ is used by the liberals and feminists to further destroy the family, debase men and fathers and blur the differences between men and women.

Thus we have the unisex, gelded ‘parent’.

Monica Lee and her ilk may think that taking the kids to the beach, buying ice cream and being “warm and fuzzy” and getting all touchy-feely and spending “quality time” are important traits of a good father and “proof” of “parenting skills”.

However, these traits and activities are more those of a mother than a father. Could this be because Obama was raised fatherless by his grandmother and is a ‘defective child’?

Read Lee’s piece of crap that passes as journalism on the phony website “examiner.com” where they apparently let any nit-wit become an “examiner”. “Obama proves he’s got parenting skills” by Monica Lee.

Perhaps what Monica Lee was really looking for was a babysitter for some of her five children while she attends college rather than taking care of her children herself. On a side note, another of her articles “Scholarship season” announces that college enrollment is high during the spring, perhaps due to the fact that that’s about when people are getting ready to graduate high school and move on to college. Shocking.

The problem is that we have not taught our children or even spoken of the real role of fathers for fear of the wrath of the feminists and the PC police. A father’s first responsibility is to provide for and protect his family. He is then responsible for leadership, making important decisions, providing discipline and organization for the family. Much of this is not done on the beaches of Hawaii. The father is the “rock” of the family, not “Michelle” as he claims.

This further proves that the liberals and feminists real agenda is to totally usurp the authority, responsibility and leadership of the father and place it in the hands of the “we got a program for that” government nanny-state.

Mike Truman Decline of the Family, Obama