Joan Swirsky has blessed us once again with a with another must read masterpiece exposing the truth behind Obama, the most cloistered and narcissistic president in recent history. She lays it on the line so that the most closed-minded liberal Israel hater is left grasping the air.
I grew up in a far left liberal Jewish family where Israel was hated as a war-mongering nation and oppressor of the Arabs and Palestinians whose plight was championed constantly.
I left to live in Israel for several years to see for myself, to work with the people of Israel and engage in their national past-time, political debate.
Obama’s hatred of Jews and Israel, formerly suspected, but not so obvious, is now formally out in the open with his speech last week, as if we didn’t know it, outlining his goal of the destruction of Israel.
Right on cue, someone, perhaps George Soros, showed Obama the Queen of Diamonds and he “assassinated” Israel. All hail the new Arafat.
Irrational though it may seem, a large segment of Obama’s base are the self-destructive, self-hating, Israel hating liberal American Jews. These Jews are usually atheistic, their religion is Liberalism, their devotion to the Progressive’s dogma is above all, above their country and even their own survival.
Educating Obama: Netanyahu schools Obama in Middle East realities and political statesmanship, issues sharp rebuke
Obama stepped in it the other day when he blindsided Israel and politically ambushed Israeli prime minister Netanyahu with his speech at the State Department outlining his bizarre proposal for re-drawing Israeli borders back to their 1967 positions.
Obama hates Israel and disrespects Netanyahu and Jews. When it comes to folks he likes, such as the president of Mexico, Venezuela and the Muslim Brotherhood he bends over backwards. When it comes to Israel Obama is the new Arafat.
In fact, I believe Obama has a Jew problem.
Israel celebrated her Independence Day a few days ago and the mainstream media seems to relish the opportunity not to recount and praise the struggle for freedom and our half-century plus strong alliance, but rather to disparage, malign and condemn her with outright lies to subtle half-truths and skewed reporting.
Israel declared her independence in May 1948 and was recognized as a country, free from Great Britain, by the United Nations and Harry S. Truman, the president of the Untied Sates at the time.
What’s very interesting and not widely known is that Israel celebrates her Independence Day, strange as it may seem, the day after her Memorial Day. It’s like two contrasting or conflicting holidays, one following the next, with emotions switching between two ends of the spectrum.
There is a debate raging about how much credit Obama deserves, or should take concerning the Navy SEALs killing of Osama bin-Laden. Obama certainly got a nifty boost in the polls this week and it seems he is playing it for all it’s worth and for as long as he can anyway.
He is headed off to Texas of all places today in an attempt to parlay his recent political capital gains into an attempt to have it both ways on immigration, and oh, yes, to pick up some cool cash at a fund-raiser while he is at it, of course.
Our Politician-in-Chief, trained in the Chicago style of back-ally politics, never wanting a crisis to go to waste, is milking Bin-Ladin for all he’s worth.
Didn’t the liberals accuse Bush of using 9/11 for grandstanding?
Now, someone, we don’t know who, registered the domain name “gutsycall.com” and has it linked to Obama’s 2012 campaign website.
“Obama’s not one to “spike the football” after a victory (or after killing Osama bin Laden), but it seems his campaign team (or some of his ardent supporters) doesn’t feel the same way.”
–Sweetness & Light
So says David Beamer, 911 hero Todd Beamer’s dad on Fox News, watch the Video below on Real Clear Politics.
I have said for a long time that Obama suffers from a narcissistic personality disorder, where the world is seen from the point of view of himself, Obama the narcissist.
Let’s get this straight, I really don’t care if Muslims, or anyone else for that matter, are offended by photos of Osama with his brains blown out.
I’m not worried about inflaming the “Arab Street” or if it will make Muslims hate us anymore than the do now.
I was offended by watching folks jump out of the windows from the towers on 9/11, now that was offensive.
I assure you that no Muslim was worried about offending any Americans when they chopped off Danny Pearls head and video taped it.
No Islamic warlord in Mogadishu worried about offending anyone when they dragged the bodies of our helicopter pilots through the streets.
No Muslim terrorist was worried about offending anyone or if it would make Americans hate them when they blew up the U.S.S. Cole.
Yeah, the wicked witch (I guess “warlock” would be a better fit) of the middle east is dead, but just like Dorothy found out, there are others to take their place.
I’ve gathered some stores about some real ‘witches’ like Hamas, Fatah and the “Pakies” to enlighten you – stories you won’t see in the main-stream American Media.
Many in America think that the death of Osam bin Laden is the death of radical Islam and its related terrorism. This is the ill-informed politically correct view.
President Obama stated incorrectly in his speech to the nation on Sunday night, that “…we are not against war with Isalam…” Nothing can be further from the truth.
With finally some measure of justice for 9/11 and an international reign of terror and murder that spanned more than a decade, Islam begins to react. But not the way that the liberal bleeding-hearts would like.
“But I thought the majority of all Muslims were ‘peaceful’ ?
Here are some of the headlines from the folks that cover these types of things:
Like Media Matters, I wonder if Geoge Soros paid for this site too.
“Since November of 2008 we’ve seen many photographs of the President and his infamous Presidential “smug.” One has to wonder the reason for his blatant arrogance when his poll numbers continue to plummet and his leadership abilities have been in question. Apparently Obama only reads the desperate letters he often refers to reading but doesn’t feel the need to read bills but insist they be passed.” – A Patriotic Nurse
Read the Full Story here: Obama can’t create jobs but he can create “ATTACK WATCH”
On the anniversary of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, Nov. 19, 1863 we find ourselves on the brink of a resurgence of Tyranny, thanks to Obamacare and the Left.
It is encouraging news [however] that the Supreme Court has decided to consider the constitutionality of key provisions of Obamacare — the Affordable Care Act. – Star Parker We’re ignoring the Constitution – November 19th, 2011
It irritates me how Barack Obama often compares himself to President Abraham Lincoln, no two people could be more opposite.
Lincoln revered God and our Constitution and loved our country. It seems like Obama simply has disdain for all three.
Don’t even get me started on chicken-neck Michelle.
So today, thanks to Star Parker, it’s Obama and Tyranny vs. Lincoln and the Constitution.
“To suggest that a nation “conceived in Liberty” can tolerate a handful of Washington bureaucrats telling several hundred million citizens what health insurance is and forcing them to buy it is beyond absurd.” – Star Parker
Read the full text of her excellent article here: We’re ignoring the Constitution
Here we go again…
As I explained before, people who grow up without strong male leadership, (a father) develop serious personality disorders, e.g. narcissism, etc. and are defective. Two of these many defects are present in Obama, lack of conviction and a need to please, we witness in Obama’s recent flip-flop on the 9/11 mosque debate.
First, vowing to stay out of the debate and repeatedly saying it was a “local decision” he gave in to his need to be loved by all at a recent white house dinner for Muslims, (that in it self is another story, I wonder why there are hardy any photos on www.whitehouse.gov?) came out in favor of building the controversial mosque citing freedom of religion and American values.
“This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the Founders must endure.”
Now, less than 24 hours later, two of his defects kick in, one, his lack of conviction and two, his need to be loved by whoever is seeking it, he backtracks on his first change of his position to create a third position statement. Incredible.
Obama and those who are in favor of building a mosque at ground zero are wrong on many fronts; they often site “freedom of religion” and “American values” as their main reasons.
First of all Islam is more about a political movement and conquest than it is about a religion, and should not be considered on equal footing with other main-stream religions.
That can be a whole subject for another debate, however, even if you did conclude it is a valid religion there are additional issues.
One, a mosque is not equivalent to a church in the Western meaning. Second, “freedom of religion” and “separation of church and state” have had their original meanings twisted so much as to make the present-day understandings incorrect.
The first amendment, below, does not explicitly grant the right to build a mosque any where you please and to have the government rush in and support you if you wanted to build a mosque say on an airport runway.
Since we have established that you can’t build a mosque, or anything else for that matter, ANY where you want, we still have the issue of how not building a mosque at ground zero, but some blocks away amounts to restricting the “free exercise thereof”.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Obama says the debate is about American values, good, because Islam is the antitheses of American values. And most Americans know it.
Read more about the Mosque at 9/11
The word ‘parenting’ is a meaningless word given to us from the PC police.
Whenever you hear this word ask the person if they mean fathering or mothering as there is no such thing as ‘parenting’. The word ‘parenting’ is used by the liberals and feminists to further destroy the family, debase men and fathers and blur the differences between men and women.
Thus we have the unisex, gelded ‘parent’.
Monica Lee and her ilk may think that taking the kids to the beach, buying ice cream and being “warm and fuzzy” and getting all touchy-feely and spending “quality time” are important traits of a good father and “proof” of “parenting skills”.
However, these traits and activities are more those of a mother than a father. Could this be because Obama was raised fatherless by his grandmother and is a ‘defective child’?
Read Lee’s piece of crap that passes as journalism on the phony website “examiner.com” where they apparently let any nit-wit become an “examiner”. “Obama proves he’s got parenting skills” by Monica Lee.
Perhaps what Monica Lee was really looking for was a babysitter for some of her five children while she attends college rather than taking care of her children herself. On a side note, another of her articles “Scholarship season” announces that college enrollment is high during the spring, perhaps due to the fact that that’s about when people are getting ready to graduate high school and move on to college. Shocking.
The problem is that we have not taught our children or even spoken of the real role of fathers for fear of the wrath of the feminists and the PC police. A father’s first responsibility is to provide for and protect his family. He is then responsible for leadership, making important decisions, providing discipline and organization for the family. Much of this is not done on the beaches of Hawaii. The father is the “rock” of the family, not “Michelle” as he claims.
This further proves that the liberals and feminists real agenda is to totally usurp the authority, responsibility and leadership of the father and place it in the hands of the “we got a program for that” government nanny-state.
Obama, raised fatherless, denigrates men, harms children, and promotes single motherhood with executive order signed yesterday.
On March 11, 2009, in Washington, President Obama signed an Executive Order creating the White House Council on Women and Girls; and by fiat, seeks to devalue fathers and men, and promote single parenthood as something young girls should achieve, and reinforces the creation of a whole new class of special victims “both at home and abroad” (whatever that means). Read release from the White House posted on their website.
Men and women in the role of parents, are two sides of the same coin and have to be seen as a single unit or ‘being’.
When speaking of men and women in terms of the family, or with respect to children, they are both two sides of the same coin. You can’t separate them, if you praise one, by inference you automatically disparage the other. The concept of parents as a team, indivisible, united, tied together in a symbiotic relationship, physically and emotionally, is being destroyed in this country by changing the notion of single parenthood from something to be avoided at all costs, as broken, defective, abnormal, shunned and shameful to be something to be promoted as good, heroic, supported, praised and worse of all, something that is ‘normal’.
It’s as if someone ran around proclaiming his right foot was something special and needed special treatment and protection above all other feet. What does this say about the left foot? About the person? Do you see the absurdity in this idea?
Exalting women, especially for something that normally should be a negative, devalues men, fathers and hurts children.
Obama, raised fatherless himself, is a “defective product” of our single parent, fatherless society he so often praises. Children raised fatherless often have a distorted view of women, their proper role in their relationships with men and their abilities and issues. They also have a distorted view of fathers and men. The distortion always tends to be sympathetic and positive towards women and single mothers, and negative and disparaging towards men. It is as if the mother’s anger towards men, their constant blaming for their dismal situation, lack of money or resources on the father, is transferred to the child.
This transference is done slowly, insidiously, subconsciously and not just from the mother, the emotionally developing child picks this blame game up from other sources in society such as television, Hollywood and politicians. Even if the message is very subtle, (and it normally is) the child gets it from inference and deduction.
What else would we expect? The single parent child is constantly hearing how difficult it is for his mother and how she “struggles”, how much she sacrifices for her children, how heroic she is.
If we have such a wonderful heroine, logically we must have an equally evil villain. Logically therefore, since the father is the other half of the coin, and all the other kids have fathers, and the father is not around to defend himself, the child sees the father as the villain.
Making “violence against women” a special class of crime creates a special class of victims, and therefore, logically, a special class of criminals and villains, all to be treated differently, worse then ‘regular’ criminals. Is not violence simply violence? Why can’t we just be against violence? If we somehow raise violence against women to a special place as being especially evil, are we saying that other forms of violence is somehow less evil? Are we now saying the men who commit violence against women are now especially evil? Worse than ordinary criminals?
If there is no ‘bad’, then, there is no ‘good’.
Obama and the liberals are invested in coming up with new ‘bad’. The liberals have always loved to constantly create new and more classes of victims. Why? Because if you don’t have victims, you don’t have a cause, a movement, a crusade, a fight. We all know that in a fight there are two sides, evil vs. good. Therefore, since the so-called ‘victim’ could only become a victim by an act of victimization by someone, and that someone logically must be an evil villain, the liberals now have a cause to join and, of course, they will join the fight on the side of “good” so they feel good about themselves!
Why would they need to feel especially good about themselves in the first place?
This is because that they know, perhaps subconsciously or instinctively, that what they are doing, is inherently wrong to begin with. Mothers, somehow sense that depriving a child of their father is wrong and being a single parent is not normal and is difficult on them both. So to compensate, they seek to make themselves feel better, they seek out praise and re-enforcement that they are doing the right thing and, therefore, based on the fact that they are good, the father obviously is to blame.
Good and bad are basic, instinctive emotional feelings and concepts. So is blame.
Don’t they realize what they are doing? No. If you want a quick fix and you operate on emotion as mothers are designed to do, you cannot evaluate your situation based upon logic or common sense. It simply is easier to explain to the fatherless child who yearns for his long ago rejected father, that “daddy is bad”. The liberals have seized on this as a way to get votes from females. Why else would Obama so often praise single mothers, denigrate and insult men and fathers in his “Father’s day Speech” in a church no less.
To sum it up Obama, a defective child himself is repeating the cycle of his fatherless upbringing. He has helped to create a whole bunch of women good-doers that want to feel good about themselves as they go about destroying families, their children and themselves.
They are taking a big sharp knife and stabbing it as hard as they can, in their left foot; simply because they hear it is good to spite their right foot.
Great Communicator: Obama hides his double talk within his rhetoric
We all love to hear what we want to hear and it has never been easier than now with our silver tongued president.
When Obama says: “We have to look at offshore drilling”, the conservatives hear “Why of course we will have to open up these areas” and the liberal environmentalists hear “Why of course we will have to eliminate offshore drilling”.
In an era where we need to provide certainty and confidence to the markets, Obama and his real plans still remain an enigma to those listening to him talk.
On top of that investors are seeing a divide between what Obama says and what he does. Most obvious are the thousands of earmarks contained in the budget bill signed today. During the campaign Obama promised to eliminate earmarks if elected, however, his budget contains about 9,000 earmarks. Obama recently claimed that earmarks were taken care of when he was in the senate.
On top of all this, we still have a media that won’t allow anyone to challenge Obama, much less they themselves. The gullible press covering Obama are more like cheerleaders rather than hard-nosed reporters. I predict it will be said of the press that they let the country down at a time when they were needed the most.
Look at what happened to Limbaugh when he said he hoped Obama would fail and compare that to the reaction when James Carville said basically the same thing during a press conference in 2001 that he hoped George Bush would not succeed.
Barack Obama is a great pretender. He constantly says he’s doing things that he isn’t, and he relies on his powerful rhetoric to obscure the difference. He has made “responsibility” a personal theme, and the budget’s cover line is “A New Era of Responsibility.” He claims that the budget begins “making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline.” It doesn’t. –Presidential Double-Talk Robert J. Samuelson
But my guess is that Obama is a political coward.
Wednesday, March 4, On his daily radio show, radio talkmaster Rush Limbaugh issued a challenge to President Obama to a debate. As of now the White House has not responded. Rush is right, Obama should debate, but my guess is Obama won’t. Why? Political Cowardice
The liberals would rather put Limbaugh on an “enemy list” or use the “Fairness Doctrine” to silence him, according to Michal Savage. I agree.
Egging him one, Rush continued: “I, Mr. President, will send my jet, EIB One, to pick you up and bring you here and take you back to wherever you want to go. You’d love it. It’s not as big and luxurious as your jet, but it’s got enough seats for your Secret Service detail. . . .
The fawning Nancy Pelosi out-claps Joe Biden.
“We haven’t seen someone so into clapping since that mother at the second-grade Flutophone concert.” – Top of the Ticket
Should we tell Michelle?
Looks like Obama has an incestuous relationship with another branch of government, that Pelosi woman. It was a “love-in” during that “speech” the other night, all we missed was seeing her drool.
I don’t know if it was those fawning eyes, too much Mountain Dew, or Botox but she looked like she wanted to plant a warm wet one right on his head.
Not to mention she was on her feet so fast and so often her chair never warmed.
You have got to see this:
Reminds me of that game: “Whack-a-Mole”